|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| www.DogsInTheNews.com |
Volume I - Issue 4 - April 2001 |
April 17, 2001 |
|
Policeman Goes Berserk, Mutilates Beagle |
|
|
April 17, 2001 More than a year after Attleboro police closed the case, purportedly burying it for good, witness reports and crucial testimonies have resurfaced this month, telling a grisly story. The official report describes a February 2000 incident in which Lucky, an 11-year-old beagle burrowed under his fence and ran into the street.
Officer Peter Schaefer of the Attleboro Police Department arrived at the scene just before an animal control specialist showed up. The policeman attempted to detain the dog, but was bitten in the chaos, and the dog escaped, running south down the residential street where he lived. The policeman got into his car and pursued Lucky for several blocks. Then, the policeman reports, he ''inadvertently ran over the dog'', and then ''uthanized'' (sic) him to relieve his suffering. Lucky was shot with a 12-gauge shotgun at close range. An autopsy was never conducted (Lucky's body was disposed of), and no other witnesses were logged in the report. Case closed. But now, with the help of City Councilor Roxanne Houghton, Lucky's owners—Edward Smith, his wife and children—are trying to expose this case to the public. They managed to obtain the eyewitness report of the animal control specialist, Kathleen Pereira, whose account was never mentioned, and who, to this day, sticks by her testimony. She had arrived at the scene just as Officer Schaefer was pulling Lucky into his police cruiser. Lucky got loose and started running south. |
Ms. Pereira, who knew the dog personally, called out to him. The rest she describes (quoted from the Boston Globe):
Just after the incident, Police Chief Roland Sabourin apparently agreed with Ms. Pereira, admitting that Officer Schaefer "lost it" when the animal bit him. Both Chief Sabourin and Officer Schaefer have since declined to comment. Ms. Pereira, her supervisor Matthew Hills and Lucky's owners last year filed cruelty complaints with the Animal Rescue League, but the ARL saw no need to investigate, stating, ''We've seen no evidence that would justify an investigation.'' A San Francisco-based animal welfare group In Defense of Animals has set up a fund to help pay for the Smiths' legal expenses, should they wish to file a lawsuit. But owner Edward Smith is not demanding any monetary or punitive compensation. He says, ''All I want is an admission of what happened and an apology. Lucky was no watchdog. He could lick ya to death." Related articles from
around the web: Lucky
case rallies dog lovers §§§
|
| DogsInTheNews.com is brought to you by TheDogNet.net | |
| Copyright © 2001 Canine Nation. All rights reserved. Articles may be reprinted with proper approval. | |